Bill Nemitz’s Aug. 27 column “Whine about insurance? How about survival?” is disingenuous and off subject. The issue concerns the language of the Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications Development referendum question, specifically – the word “Insurance.” This referendum addresses the under 65 market with income at/or below 138 % of FPL. It has nothing to do with Insurance strategy plan.
For argument, Nemitz chose to talk about his melanoma. Despite having great insurance strategy, he still had bills; friends held a fundraiser for him. He has individual team health and health and fitness and health and fitness insurance strategy plan. Given the selection of Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications or individual health and health and fitness and health and fitness insurance; individual insurance strategy security is far superior – always.
Cancer — no matter what you have for coverage; team or individual health and health and fitness and health and fitness insurance strategy plan, or Mainecare — is financially devastating. Mostly because you lose your ability to work; close relatives take time off to care for you; damages means unpaid mortgages, utilities, etc.
No health and health and fitness and health and fitness insurance strategy plan changes income. The Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications development referendum will not fix this issue. Further, evoking fear that Insurance strategy plan recipients could be financially liable for $60,000 to receive the same treatment as him. Neither issue has any relevance to the debate.
Just the same, low-income seniors might be comforted to know that Maine’s Insurance strategy plan Savings Program’s among the most generous welfare safety nets in the country – with eligibility at 175 % of FPL versus 135 % FPL nationally.
So, back to topic: Should Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications be called insurance? Today, Mainers earning $12,100 per year are at 100 % of FPL, enjoy individual subsidized health and health and fitness and health and fitness insurance strategy plan through Obamacare. This security is comparable to Nemitz’s security. They have very low premiums, deductibles and out-of-pockets. Most importantly, they have provider choice.
Passage of Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications development changes these plans with Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications. The question currently worded, suggests that current individual health and health and fitness and health and fitness insurance strategy plan will be paid by Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications. This is incorrect. Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications is not insurance strategy. The language must change.
.
For argument, Nemitz chose to talk about his melanoma. Despite having great insurance strategy, he still had bills; friends held a fundraiser for him. He has individual team health and health and fitness and health and fitness insurance strategy plan. Given the selection of Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications or individual health and health and fitness and health and fitness insurance; individual insurance strategy security is far superior – always.
Cancer — no matter what you have for coverage; team or individual health and health and fitness and health and fitness insurance strategy plan, or Mainecare — is financially devastating. Mostly because you lose your ability to work; close relatives take time off to care for you; damages means unpaid mortgages, utilities, etc.
No health and health and fitness and health and fitness insurance strategy plan changes income. The Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications development referendum will not fix this issue. Further, evoking fear that Insurance strategy plan recipients could be financially liable for $60,000 to receive the same treatment as him. Neither issue has any relevance to the debate.
Just the same, low-income seniors might be comforted to know that Maine’s Insurance strategy plan Savings Program’s among the most generous welfare safety nets in the country – with eligibility at 175 % of FPL versus 135 % FPL nationally.
So, back to topic: Should Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications be called insurance? Today, Mainers earning $12,100 per year are at 100 % of FPL, enjoy individual subsidized health and health and fitness and health and fitness insurance strategy plan through Obamacare. This security is comparable to Nemitz’s security. They have very low premiums, deductibles and out-of-pockets. Most importantly, they have provider choice.
Passage of Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications development changes these plans with Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications. The question currently worded, suggests that current individual health and health and fitness and health and fitness insurance strategy plan will be paid by Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications. This is incorrect. Condition health and health and fitness and health and fitness applications is not insurance strategy. The language must change.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment